Creating Jobs and Fostering Talent in the United States

The national unemployment rate currently stands at 9.6 percent (September – October 2010), one of the highest rates seen in over 25 years (see Figure 1).  As the U.S. population grows, so does the number of unemployed persons.  The more unemployed persons we have, the more talent and resources we have going unused and being essentially wasted.

Figure 1: United States Unemployment Rate (January 1985 – October 2010)

 

 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

As of September 2010, California is experiencing unemployment rates of 12.4 percent (well above the national average) and only second to Michigan at 13.0 percent (see Figure 2).  According to the 2009 IRS Data Book, the IRS collected over $2.3 trillion in total from all 50 states, including the District of Columbia.  Of that total, California constituted approximately 11%, the highest percentage between the states.  The same goes for business income taxes.  Of the total business income taxes collected in 2009, California represented 12%, again the highest state.  So why is it that the U.S. has such a high unemployment rate and the state that generates the most revenue through commerce and services has the highest rate?

Figure 2: United States Unemployment Rates by State (September 2010)

 

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

It has been long known that the tech industry has provided the United States with tremendous revenue and continues to be a leader in the world in terms of innovation.  With so much creation and tech generation, it would be assumed that the United States’ unemployment rate, and especially California’s rate, would be relatively low.  However, this is not the case.  Companies have been outsourcing tech work internationally to countries such as China and India for many years.

In the beginning, cost was the key determinant to accepting outsourcing.  However, through decades of employing this phenomenon, the U.S. has lost its hold on talent and certain technologies.  In an article (Andy Grove: How America Can Create Jobs) written by Andy Grove, former CEO of Intel, he mentions that not only are domestic jobs at risk, but with some technologies, both scaling and innovation take place overseas.  Jobs have been lost as well as the chain of experience, which is vital to technological evolution.  If experience, talent and resources continue to be outsourced, the U.S. will eventually find itself at the back-end of technological advancement.

Systems In Motion (SIM) (http://www.systemsinmotion.com/) is trying to change that.  Pioneering what has come to be called “onshoring” or “inshoring”, the company has set up their innovation office in Fremont, California near the heart of the tech industry and its ever-growing delivery center in Ann Arbor, Michigan where unemployment rates have increased dramatically and are the highest in the nation currently.

It is SIM’s belief that tech services can be performed domestically for approximately the same cost structure as overseas without the obstacles and hassles that accompany working with foreign employees in different time-zones.  This “inshore” domestic service model has been proven time and time again with the Company’s customers and has led to better scalability, quality and flexibility.  SIM’s customers range from F-500 companies (lThomson Reuters, Best Buy) to mid-sized enterprises (Leap Frog, Matson, Abercrombie & Kent) to high-performing growth companies (Chegg, Yodlee, Nextag & Zephyr).

Systems In Motion has created over 100 jobs in Ann Arbor in less than a year with expectation to expand to 1,000 in the next few years.  Showcased in articles by ComputerWorld, The Economic Times, InformationWeek, The Michigan Daily and others (SIM Newsroom), the Company has received much praise and support for their efforts.

Global outsourcing presents itself with numerous challenges that can be either completely eradicated, or at the very least, reduced by utilizing the domestic “inshore” model (see Figure 3).  A domestic resource pool, appropriately trained, organized and managed, can be significantly more productive than a globally distributed team. Furthermore, the cost of ‘bridging the value gap’, with additional resources, greater governance, and increasing levels of infrastructure spend, can be so expensive that it negates the expected savings from globalization.

Figure 3: The Value Delivery Gap in Globally Distributed Service Models

 

Systems In Motion offers excellent expertise in numerous fields such as mobility, e-commerce, social media and business intelligence, to name a few.  The Company is able to dedicate a team to a client with on-site architects and managers that gather requirements and conduct a one-on-one relationship with the client at their offices and act as a liaison to the coders and developers in Ann Arbor.  The “inshore” model and its structure and benefits, as well accounts of domestic versus offshore services, are outlined in the Company’s whitepapers.

By utilizing domestic resources and talents, Systems In Motion is not only providing U.S. residents with jobs, but keeping the skill set, experience and learning process onshore.  In order to achieve future success and advancement, it is required that we have the talent pool and infrastructure set up onshore to support innovation.  Otherwise, we will continue see jobs and talent move to and be fostered in overseas countries.

To learn more about SIM and its “inshore” model and how the Company can help you, please visit the Company’s website and fill out the contact form or e-mail Debashish Sinha (CMO) at dsinha@systemsinmotion.com.

We are always looking to hire exceptional talent and resources. If you are interested in career opportunities with Systems In Motion, please visit the SIM Careers page or send your resume to jobs@systemsinmotion.com.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Chegg.com and Systems In Motion partner on Inshore Delivery

Today Systems In Motion announced a strategic relationship with Chegg – the #1 online college book rental company – to develop an Inshore technology service delivery organization that will support the application development, management and business intelligence needs of this high performing growth company. Systems In Motion has been working with Chegg over the last few months, and based on that experience, Chegg’s CTO, Chuck Geiger announced the strategic decision.

The key reasons for choosing Systems In Motion’s Inshore Service model as a strong strategic sourcing alternative to offshore included:

- Access to high quality US-based development and operations resources

- Agile, productive teams tightly integrated and aligned to business stakeholders

- Deep expertise in key web application development processes and technologies

- Faster “time-to-value” due to proximity, cultural compatibility and domain knowledge

- Lower risk and minimal overhead for governance and control

I’m very impressed with Systems In Motion. Your engagement manager is a rock star, and the team outperforms my expectations in terms of their flexibility and commitment to quality. After working with large offshore companies for many years, I firmly believe that Systems In Motion’s Inshore delivery model is the right balance of agility and cost-performance for fast growing companies like Chegg.

Check out the full press release here.

Posted in Inshore Services, Press coverage | Leave a comment

What does Mark Hurd joining Oracle mean for the Services Landscape

Stephen Jannise, ERP Market Analyst at ERP Software Advice believes that Mark Hurd joining the executive team at Oracle significantly increases the potential that Oracle will go big with a services acquisition to beef up its Application Implementation and Management business. Oracle has a very large set of key services partnerships that it uses both as a channel to market, as well as an expert resource pool to augment implementation capability for its large and diverse suite of software products.

Stephen believes that Oracle is now ready to seriously beef up Oracle Consulting with a major IT Services acquisition and has named a number of potential targets – including IT majors like Accenture, Infosys and Tata Consultancy Services.

By acquiring the consulting arm of PricewaterhouseCoopers in 2002, IBM solidified its dominance over the global technology services industry. Hurd’s acquisition of EDS in 2008 was seen as a direct assault on IBM Global Services, making HP the strongest contender for IBM’s throne. Now, Hurd is essentially competing against himself, facing not only IBM but also the very beast that he created, HP Enterprise Services. Can he achieve for Oracle what he has already achieved for HP?

If so, Hurd will have more than one option to choose from. Capgemini has a relatively low P/E, and its recent acquisition of a majority stake in CPM Braxis, a leader in Brazilian IT services, makes it an even tastier morsel. However, there are many other fish in the services sea, so we’ve decided to look at several other services providers as well.

Read more: http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/enterprise/oracle-to-acquire-major-it-services-firm-in-our-opinion-1090910/#ixzz0z9favzTu

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

CIO magazine discussion on US IT jobs

Neeraj Gupta, Systems In Motion’s CEO was invited to participate in a discussion on how Federal Government policies may be used to drive greater US IT job creation. Based on the specific work that Systems In Motion has done in creating a globally competitive US based IT services organization, Neeraj had the following feedback.

“Businesses will create U.S. jobs if it is their best option. We can make that so by creating a strong partnership across all stakeholders—business, government, schools and the public. The ‘centralized software factory’ model can be developed in the U.S. to reduce the [cost] gap between offshore and domestic delivery. The government needs to provide support for such models in the form of incentives. Education policy should align skills development with business requirements, providing training incentives to IT services businesses. Immigration policy should focus on attracting top skilled talent while the rest of the talent pool is developed locally. Global services companies should be required to hire Americans for U.S. positions.”

Read the whole article here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

McKinsey on IT Services: The new allure of onshore locales

McKinsey calls it ‘close-shoring’, combining Inshore and Nearshore into one category. According to their research, more and more companies are beginning to realize the value of Inshoring as a complement to their global sourcing strategies, especially for application development and business technology management in new technology areas. Full report available at https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Operations/Outsourcing/IT_services_The_new_allure_of_onshore_locales_2661

Posted in Inshore Services, Policy | Leave a comment